Friday night, after I tucked my daughter into bed, I was sitting in the comfy chair in our library room across the hall from her bedroom, where I always sit and read or plan or grade papers while she's falling asleep. I was thinking about a question my students had had that day, about platypuses. So I reached one arm down next to my chair, pulled up the one-volume New Columbia Encyclopedia that I've had since I was twelve (3,000 tissue-paper-thin pages of information in tiny print), quickly and easily flipped to the paragraph on platypuses -- and found exactly what I was looking for. The Platypus article said that they shared a primitive order of mammals only with the echidna, and I was curious, so I flipped to the Echidna article and read about those primitive spiny anteaters. On that same page was a long article on Echinoderms, so I happily read for a while about starfish and sea urchins and sea cucumbers, too.
Last night, I was too tired to plan or grade or read for information (and novels generally wait for school vacations), so I reached for my favorite book of poetry -- Always A Reckoning, by Jimmy Carter. (Yes, Jimmy Carter writes beautiful, evocative poetry about things like growing up in the deep South in the 1940's, or how a flock of geese flew by and reflected city lights beautifully one night when he and his family had been searching in vain for constellations through those same city lights, from the roof of the White House.) Other nights, I might read too many selections from my large collection of Chicken Soup for the Soul books (yes, I like that sort of thing), or browse through the perceptively told anecdotes in one of Vivian Paley's books about teaching kindergarten, or one of several books on urban high schools that were excelling through the use of "best practices" before the Internet.
In the video that we watched in class, on that high school in Philadelphia that apparently relies almost entirely on project-based-learning through web 2.0 resources, a young woman (Student? Teacher?) was quoted enthusing about her school. In explaining what it wasn't, she managed to use the words "books" and "worksheets", together, twice in a row. Yes, she's just one person -- but not really, since the editors and producers of the video decided to include her comments. Apparently, they didn't mind protraying their school, for the world, as a place where people equate books with worksheets.
I hope that the students, teachers, and schools of the future, as they continue to explore and enjoy and benefit from all of the new opportunities brought by the Internet, never lose sight of the beauty and wonder of books! The web is a great place to go when you want to know a lot about a topic, but for my simple question about platypuses, a book was perfect. I found what I wanted to know quickly and easily, without having to guess which of many articles might turn out to be written by a second-grader and which might turn out to be written half in Latin by a Ph.D. researcher on monotremes. There were no advertisements, and I didn't have to follow a zillion links to find what I was looking for. I did choose to "follow a link" (turn a few pages) to learn about a related topic (echidnas). And, I did this all from the comfort of my favorite green armchair, with nothing to plug in or boot up, and no email black hole to fall into, and no feeling that as long as I was online I ought to be working on this course as well. . .
When I browsed to the article on echinoderms, on the same page as the article on echidnas, I made use of perhaps the very best feature of traditional print resources, and the one feature that I think the Internet may never be able to replicate because it either "overdoes" it or "underdoes" it. I could probably have followed links on platypuses for a long time (Too long!) on the Internet, and I'm sure they would have led me eventually to the echidna, just as my book did. The patypus links would not have led me to echinoderms, though. There is something wonderful about the way that you can stumble upon fascinating unrelated information by flipping through a reference book or wandering the shelves of a public library, that just doesn't happen yet (and perhaps never will) when you follow links or Google something or shop at Amazon.com. Similarly, when I listen to NPR or read my Time Magazine, I hear or stumble across information on topics that I'm not all that interested in -- movie reviews and pop culture stuff and such -- that I would never set up my RSS feed to send me, but that it is still nice to know at least a little bit about.
Don't get me wrong: I think the Internet is a wonderful resource! And someday, when I want to know a lot about platypuses, I'll look there. In the meantime, I really love my library room, and I hope that books always maintain an important place in our schools and our society.
Sunday, November 8, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Thank you Diana, for a beautiful and thoughtful post.
ReplyDeleteDiana, You are eloquent...and I couldn't agree with you more. The guilt of being online without posting, the ability to wander a bit with a book versus getting lost on the internet, the cozy feel of a book, they all ring true.
ReplyDeleteThis weekend I reconnected with a poet I have read and worked with in the past: Marie Howe. In her new book The Kingdom of Ordinary Time, which I borrowed from our town library, she writes a poem she titled, "Why the Novel is Necessary but Sometimes Hard to Read."
ReplyDeleteI like this part:
You come upon the person the author put there
as if you'd been pushed into a room and told to watch the dancing---
pushed into pantries, into basements, across moors, into
the great drawing rooms of great cities, into the small cold cabin, or
to here, beside the small running river where a boy is weeping,
and no one comes,
and you have to watch without saying anything he can hear.
Dennis
Diana - I agree and couldn't have stated it better!
ReplyDeleteDiana,
ReplyDeleteWhat a treat to read and reflect upon your thoughts on the value of books. As faithful believer in books, I appreciated your insightful comments as you provided comparisons and contrasts between learning digitally and the "old fashioned way", by turning pages in your favorite books. My thoughts then turned to the recent addition to our well-equipped library, the Kindle, which now accompanies us on all of our trips. For years as we commuted internationally to Barbados, I filled many a suitcase with books to read and share with others on the island. My husband was sure that the security officials would think that I was in the "book business". Without ready access to numerous bookstores like we have here, it could take months to get the newly released books and classics alike, thus I always allocated precious room in our luggage for books. Today, thanks to digital technology, the Kindle provides numerous literary options in one small book. I guess we could debate the sacrifices of digital books including not being able to turn the page, yet when it comes to traveling I am almost ready to admit the value of the Kindle. I have found myself reading over Bryan's shoulder while on a plane or even grabbing for it before he can turn it on....
Thanks for all the thoughtful responses, everyone! (It's nice to know that people read that post, and didn't think it was too long.)
ReplyDeleteKaren, I'd be interested to try a Kindle sometime. I can certainly see the value for travelling! For short trips, though, sometimes I like the artificial restrictions on how many books can be brought along. It's a chance to leave a longer, more serious book behind and read some shorter stuff and actually FINISH it. . . It's a chance for me to get my daughter to listen to something other than Magic Treehouse books (which are great, but not the only books in the world. . .) for a change. . . So sometimes I like having fewer reading choices for a short time, and sometimes I like having to make DIFFERENT reading choices than usual. But you were travelling / living abroad for much longer periods of time! And, I DO see the potential advantages of the Kindle, for that sort of thing, definitely.
Dennis, thanks for posting the bits from that poem. I like them. :-)